From Last.fm to OLPC. Is the web making us smarter?
I m in berlin at the moment and just remembered a conversation i had with Markus Schneider whom i met here last time i visited the city. Markus is music journalist for the Berliner Zeitung. He told me how hard it was during the 80ties and 90ties to get qualified information about new music. But since 2000 he is recognizing a major increase of general music-knowledge. “Even talking to youngsters about music today, reveals an amazing knowledge about non mainstream genres.”
As cofounder of last.fm this is music to my ears. Why?
Technorati Tags: last.fm, long tail, olpc
One of our goals was to introduce new music to people and supply tools which help to discover one’s real music taste besides the industries marketing instruments. When we founded last.fm it was crystal clear that the music industry is most profitable in selling main stream artists and titles. Therefor the music marketing departments were not very interested in spreading the word about niche musical genres besides the mainstream genres. And because mass media (radio, tv) was the dominant culture- distributor and the music marketing guys were real friends with the mass media maker we were living in a cultural hegemony. So when founding last.fm the goal which was buried deep down in loads of other goals, was not just to break the dominance of mass media, but also to break the dominance of the music industry and get people out of the cultural hegemony. (hence the name, last.fm).
So listening to this music journalist told me that the whole thing actually works. You don’t need to read the long tail in order to see real indications that the internet and especially recommendation and personalization technologies are pushing the wisdom of our species. The web became the number 1 resource of information and recommendation and personalization tools bring the right information to the right minds. If you look at this closer the web looks more and more like a teacher. To me, a good teacher as well as the current status of the web features the following characteristics :
• Information resource….. A shear endless resource of information about almost everything on this planet
• Pedagogic methodology…. Don’t confuse pupils, give it to them when they need it.
• Communicate… Give pupils tools to rise their voice and exchange their thoughts which will increase the learning effect
Instead of falling into an academically discussion about e-learning (..yawn) i want to tell you something about another interesting person i met about two weeks ago - Nicolas Negroponte. Nicolas is currently running most of MIT and doing another thousand things, one of it is the One Laptop Per Child project, also known as the 100$ laptop. The idea behind the OLPC project in short, is to support kids in developing countries (and others..) with laptops. These laptops are really smart, because they have things like a handle bar to manually charge the batteries and they have wifi capabilities able to create open mashed networks. I asked about the content on these laptops. One strategy about content is a built in wiki which is shared through the wifi network. So of course this is clever, but learning from what we know and checking the list from above, i think one critical part is missing: Pedagogic methodology - Don’t confuse pupils, give it to them when they need it -. Because most of the 100$ laptop is programmed in python and Lovely Systems is doing stuff in python, i offered Nicolas our help. I guess the bit where i would start working at, is the - Don’t confuse… give it when it is needed. I m quite curios if we get something done.
Is all web making us smarter?
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge183.html
(Lanier is somehow involved in SL)
I guess you already know this article. I read it two times and its still kicking.
Its really fascinating that during the 20th century there has always been a matching between media-technology and pedagogical practices.
(http://www.nyu.edu/its/pubs/connect/spring05/whelan_it_history.html)
radio, film - behaviourism
desktop computers - cognitivism
OLPC - constructivism, navigationism?
I believe there is now other way than working yourself through the chaos.
wow, that is a lot of useful information. Will read this all in the plane and certainly come back about it.
[...] Users: We are trying to make this thing as simple to use as possible. The threshold to input your books will become less with every development iteration and the services you get in return will increase with every development iteration. Let us know how to improve the machine and we will certainly do it. Publishers: Don’t be afraid of the possibilities digital distribution gives. Sooner or later everything will fall into place. Start experimenting and support people who are trying to lead the sector into digital distribution. Think sharp about how to handle topics like the german “buch preis bindung” and prepare for an open market. Writers: Threshold to publish might get lower but the quality of writing will certainly increase because the know how of users will increase. See this story. Inventors: Guys, let me know when you have something which looks like a digital book reader. I think it has huge potential ;-) [...]